feat(extension): add timelapse for Moonraker #101

Open
opened 2021-08-16 19:14:44 +02:00 by thiccnugget · 6 comments
thiccnugget commented 2021-08-16 19:14:44 +02:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Installing the timelapse component in mainsail for Moonraker is not the easiest thing for everyone.

It would be nice to have an option in Kiauh to automatically install the timelapse component and to generate the configuration for the Moonraker.conf file and the macros for hyperlapse (timed timelapse) and standard timelapse (at layer change).

The end user can then choose to use either hyperlapse or the standard timelapse.

I'm talking about this
https://github.com/FrYakaTKoP/moonraker/blob/dev-timelapse/moonraker/components/timelapse.py

Installing the timelapse component in mainsail for Moonraker is not the easiest thing for everyone. It would be nice to have an option in Kiauh to automatically install the timelapse component and to generate the configuration for the Moonraker.conf file and the macros for hyperlapse (timed timelapse) and standard timelapse (at layer change). The end user can then choose to use either hyperlapse or the standard timelapse. I'm talking about this https://github.com/FrYakaTKoP/moonraker/blob/dev-timelapse/moonraker/components/timelapse.py
whazor commented 2022-01-12 15:33:20 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Timelapse component is currently in a repository of the mainsail crew. As the installation is similar to other klipper components I think it definitely makes sense to add it to kiauh.

Timelapse component is currently in [a repository](https://github.com/mainsail-crew/moonraker-timelapse) of the mainsail crew. As the installation is similar to other klipper components I think it definitely makes sense to add it to kiauh.
CODeRUS commented 2022-02-13 00:46:59 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

kiauh have https://github.com/nlef/moonraker-telegram-bot which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension

kiauh have https://github.com/nlef/moonraker-telegram-bot which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension
FrYakaTKoP commented 2022-02-13 00:55:01 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@CODeRUS

which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension

Can you describe in more detail what you mean by that? I'm happy to improve the plugin. Btw. it's not a mainsail extension, it's a moonraker plugin/component. Mainsail only does integrate it into the Ui.

@CODeRUS > which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension Can you describe in more detail what you mean by that? I'm happy to improve the plugin. Btw. it's not a mainsail extension, it's a moonraker plugin/component. Mainsail only does integrate it into the Ui.
CODeRUS commented 2022-02-13 13:27:44 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@FrYakaTKoP it uses opencv for image/video manipulations which is much much more faster and reliable

@FrYakaTKoP it uses opencv for image/video manipulations which is much much more faster and reliable
FrYakaTKoP commented 2022-02-15 00:32:41 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@CODeRUS that's a fair point, but i took the wget/ffmpeg route, because it has other advantages. I may look into adding a option for opencv backend in future. But since the wget/ffmpeg variant runs pretty good in most cases and even on lowend hardware, i still don't get why refering this point as:

which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension

Do you have any other suggestion, i may take on my journey improving the plugin?

@CODeRUS that's a fair point, but i took the wget/ffmpeg route, because it has other advantages. I may look into adding a option for opencv backend in future. But since the wget/ffmpeg variant runs pretty good in most cases and even on lowend hardware, i still don't get why refering this point as: > which handles timelapse much better than mainsail extension Do you have any other suggestion, i may take on my journey improving the plugin?
CODeRUS commented 2022-02-15 00:50:25 +01:00 (Migrated from github.com)

@FrYakaTKoP thats okay for me, anyway, if using telegram bot no need to use any additional timelapse functionalities. no doubts can be useful for people who dont want telegram stuff on their printers. and as user i'd like to look at challenge making ultimate timelapse solution guys :))

@FrYakaTKoP thats okay for me, anyway, if using telegram bot no need to use any additional timelapse functionalities. no doubts can be useful for people who dont want telegram stuff on their printers. and as user i'd like to look at challenge making ultimate timelapse solution guys :))
Sign in to join this conversation.