From 2ab34c0c6693ae9189911788346789450ea10342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Endorphin3D Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 12:26:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add STL link in step docs --- docs/stages/stage-1.md | 2 ++ docs/stages/stage-2.md | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/stages/stage-1.md b/docs/stages/stage-1.md index bf7dd59..108aaad 100644 --- a/docs/stages/stage-1.md +++ b/docs/stages/stage-1.md @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ permalink: docs/stages/stage-1 --- {% capture printing %} +**STL files for this stage are** [here](https://github.com/endorphin3d/endorphin/tree/main/STLs/stage-1) + It should be easy to guess the print orientation for most of these parts. The only difficult one is the oddly-shaped front corner assembly. There's one particularly flat face on the part that has no fillets on the corners; this is the face that was designed to be on the print bed. You should use **100% infill** for these parts and at least **4 perimeters/walls** (for screw hole durability). Parts printed with 0.2mm layer height look fantastic but 0.24mm is several hours faster. diff --git a/docs/stages/stage-2.md b/docs/stages/stage-2.md index 334e57b..de8488a 100644 --- a/docs/stages/stage-2.md +++ b/docs/stages/stage-2.md @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ permalink: docs/stages/stage-2 --- {% capture printing %} +**STL files for this stage are** [here](https://github.com/endorphin3d/endorphin/tree/main/STLs/stage-2) + Deciding which face to print is somewhat of a tossup for these two pieces, as far as strength goes. Pictured is the print orientation used for testing and the test printer has been going strong for 6 months now with no issues. {: .text-justify } {% endcapture %}